In 2017, researchers at Orb Media tested tap water samples from 14 countries on five continents. They found microplastic particles in 83% of samples globally — and in 94% of US samples, the highest rate of any country tested. Since then, dozens of follow-up studies have confirmed the finding. Microplastics are essentially ubiquitous in US drinking water at this point.
What’s less clear is what that actually means for human health. Microplastics are a relatively new contaminant in the regulatory sense, with no federal drinking water limit, no EWG health guideline (because there isn’t enough toxicology data yet to set one), and no required utility testing. This guide walks through what’s actually known, what’s still being studied, and how to filter them out while the science catches up.
What microplastics actually are
Microplastics are plastic particles smaller than 5 millimeters. Nanoplastics — particles smaller than 1 micrometer — are a subcategory. They come from many sources:
Primary microplastics are intentionally manufactured at small sizes — microbeads in cosmetics (mostly banned in the US since 2017), industrial abrasives, fibers in synthetic clothing.
Secondary microplastics are fragments of larger plastic items broken down by sunlight, abrasion, and wear. Single-use plastic bottles, food packaging, tires shedding rubber on roads, and synthetic clothing fibers shedding in washing machines are the dominant sources.
These particles enter the water supply through stormwater runoff, wastewater treatment plant effluent (treatment plants do not effectively remove them), and direct atmospheric deposition.
What the health research currently shows
The honest answer is: we don’t fully know yet. Microplastic research in humans is at roughly the stage that PFAS research was 15 years ago — strong suggestive evidence of harm, with conclusive epidemiological data still being collected.
What’s known:
Microplastics accumulate in human tissue. Microplastic particles have been documented in human blood, lung tissue, placenta, breast milk, and testicular tissue in peer-reviewed studies between 2022 and 2025. They cross biological barriers more easily than larger particles.
They carry chemical additives. Plastics contain plasticizers (phthalates), flame retardants, stabilizers, and dyes. Many of these are endocrine disruptors. As microplastics break down in the body, these chemicals leach out.
They can adsorb other contaminants. PFAS, heavy metals, and persistent organic pollutants stick to microplastic surfaces, effectively concentrating other contaminants and delivering them together.
Animal studies show effects on cellular health. Lab studies in mice and zebrafish show inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, and effects on reproduction and development at exposure levels comparable to estimated human intake.
What’s still being established:
- The dose-response curve in humans
- Which size fraction (microplastics vs. nanoplastics) drives most harm
- Whether the chemical additives or the particles themselves are the bigger problem
- Long-term outcomes (cancer, cardiovascular, neurological)
The scientific consensus is that microplastics are “very likely” harmful to humans, but quantifying how harmful at typical exposure levels is still in progress.
Why utilities don’t filter microplastics out
Conventional water treatment is not designed for microplastic removal. The standard treatment train (coagulation, sedimentation, filtration through sand, disinfection) removes some larger microplastic particles but lets smaller ones (and almost all nanoplastics) pass through.
There’s no regulatory requirement to test for or remove microplastics, so utilities don’t invest in upgrades. The few utilities that have voluntarily measured microplastics in their treated water typically find detectable levels.
This isn’t a failure of any specific utility — it’s a structural gap in how US drinking water is regulated. Microplastics will likely be regulated in the next decade, but for now, the burden falls on the consumer.
How to filter microplastics
Two technologies have demonstrated effective microplastic removal in independent testing:
Reverse osmosis (most effective)
RO membranes have pore sizes in the 0.0001-0.001 micron range, which is smaller than even nanoplastics. RO systems remove essentially 100% of microplastics and the vast majority of nanoplastics.
This is the same technology recommended for PFAS, heavy metals, and most other concerning contaminants — which is part of why RO is such a popular all-in-one solution for households with serious water quality concerns.
Activated carbon block (very effective for larger microplastics)
Solid carbon block filters with sub-micron pore ratings (typically 0.5 microns or smaller) physically capture most microplastics, though they perform less well against the smallest nanoplastics. Look for filters specifically rated for “sub-micron” or “0.5 micron absolute” filtration.
NSF Protocol P231 is the relevant certification for microbiological cyst removal, which uses similar pore size and is a good proxy for microplastic removal capacity.
What does NOT remove microplastics
- Most refrigerator filters (pore sizes too large)
- Basic Brita-style pitchers
- Boiling water (does nothing for microplastics; may release more from kettles)
- Water softeners
- “Alkaline” or “ionized” water systems
Top filter recommendations for microplastics
Best overall: AquaTru Countertop Reverse Osmosis. Removes essentially 100% of microplastics, plus all other major contaminants. NSF/ANSI 58 certified. No plumbing required, fits on a countertop. $449-599.
Best under-sink: Aquasana OptimH2O Reverse Osmosis + Claryum. Same RO technology with a dedicated drinking water faucet. Better choice for homeowners. $429-549.
Best pitcher option: Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher. Sub-micron carbon block design captures most microplastics. Not as thorough as RO but a strong middle-ground choice for renters or households on a budget. $80-95.
Other practical steps to reduce microplastic exposure
Filtering tap water addresses one source. Several others matter too:
Stop drinking bottled water as a default. Studies have consistently found that bottled water contains more microplastics than tap water — often 10-100x more — because of leaching from the plastic bottle itself. Filtered tap water is a better choice on this metric.
Avoid heating food in plastic containers. Heat accelerates microplastic and chemical release. Glass and ceramic containers for microwaving and food storage substantially reduce exposure.
Use natural-fiber clothing where practical. Synthetic clothing (polyester, nylon, acrylic) sheds microplastic fibers in washing machines, which then enter the water supply. Cotton, wool, hemp, and linen don’t shed microplastics.
Use a washing machine filter. Devices like the PlanetCare or Cora Ball capture synthetic fibers in your washing machine effluent before they reach the water supply.
The bottom line
Microplastics are in nearly all US tap water, and the health research, while incomplete, points toward real concern. The regulatory environment is years behind the science. The practical response for any household is to install a reverse osmosis system at the kitchen tap, which addresses microplastics along with most other contaminants in one investment.
The science isn’t conclusive yet, but the precautionary principle applies: filtering is cheap, comprehensive RO systems are widely available, and waiting for definitive epidemiology before acting is not the wise choice when the intervention is so easy.
Find your water by ZIP code to see what else is in your local water supply and get a filter recommendation matched to your full contaminant profile.