Tap Water Quality Report
Tap water quality in APOPKA, Florida
Tap water in APOPKA, Florida receives a grade of D (64/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by APOPKA, CITY OF (5 WTPS). The most significant water quality concerns are: PFAS contamination; Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline; Arsenic detected. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.
What's in APOPKA's tap water
Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utility serving APOPKA.
PFAS contamination
Severe concernPerfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) detected. PFAS are persistent chemicals linked to cancer and immune effects with no known safe exposure threshold.
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 29.5 ppb, 492x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs) detected at 45.7 ppb, 304x above the EWG health guideline of 0.15 ppb.
Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 23.2 ppb, 232x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.
Arsenic detected
Moderate concernArsenic detected at 0.14 ppb.
Recommended filters for APOPKA
Filters matched to the specific contaminants in APOPKA's water supply.
Reverse Osmosis or NSF P473 certified carbon
$80-$750Activated carbon and RO are the only technologies proven to remove PFAS at certified levels.
Carbon block (NSF/ANSI 42 + 53)
$40-$750Activated carbon is highly effective for disinfection byproducts like TTHM and HAA5.
Reverse Osmosis
$249-$750Arsenic is most effectively removed by reverse osmosis. Some specialized adsorptive filters also work.
Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.
All contaminants detected in APOPKA's tap water
Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →
| Contaminant | Detected | EWG US health-based |
EPA US legal |
EU DWD Europe |
WHO global |
CA PHG strictest US |
Tested sample year |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) PFAS |
4.96 ppt | 0.3 | 4.0 | 100 | 100 | 1 | — | EPA violation |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9) Disinfection byproduct |
29.5 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 492× over |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Disinfection byproduct |
45.7 ppb | 0.15 | 80.0 | 100 | — | — | — | 304× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Disinfection byproduct |
23.2 ppb | 0.1 | 60.0 | 60 | — | — | — | 232× over |
| Arsenic Heavy metal |
0.14 ppb | 0.004 | 10.0 | 10 | 10 | 0.004 | — | 35× over |
| Radium, combined (-226 and -228) Radiological |
0.44 pCi/L | 0.05 | 5.0 | — | — | — | — | 8.8× over |
| Chlorate Disinfection byproduct |
505.2 ppb | 210.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 2.4× over |
| Nitrate Inorganic |
0.0778 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | Below guideline |
| Chromium (hexavalent) Heavy metal |
0.00535 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Molybdenum Other |
9.23 ppb | 40.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| 1,4-Dioxane Semi-volatile organic compound |
0.0092 ppb | 0.35 | — | — | 50 | 1 | — | Below guideline |
| Barium Heavy metal |
7.8 ppb | 700.0 | 2000.0 | — | 1300 | 2000 | — | Below guideline |
| Vanadium Other |
0.225 ppb | 21.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Manganese Heavy metal |
1.0 ppb | 100.0 | — | 50 | 80 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Strontium Radiological |
0.683 ppb | 1500.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Fluoride Inorganic |
0.218 ppm | — | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | — | Below guideline |
All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.
Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.
Treatment plant contact info
For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from APOPKA, CITY OF (5 WTPS).