Tap Water Quality Report
Tap water quality in TITUSVILLE, Florida
Tap water in TITUSVILLE, Florida receives a grade of D (65/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by TITUSVILLE, CITY OF. The most significant water quality concerns are: PFAS contamination; Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Arsenic significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.
What's in TITUSVILLE's tap water
Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utility serving TITUSVILLE.
PFAS contamination
Severe concernPerfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) detected. PFAS are persistent chemicals linked to cancer and immune effects with no known safe exposure threshold.
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 33.9 ppb, 564x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Arsenic significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernArsenic detected at 0.9 ppb, 225x above the EWG health guideline of 0.004 ppb.
Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 14.0 ppb, 140x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.
EPA compliance record
Official U.S. EPA records for TITUSVILLE, CITY OF (system ID FL3051367) for the last 3 years. Checked 2026-10-07.
| Rule | Type | Since | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ground Water Rule | Missed testing or reporting | 07/01/2025 | Open |
Source: U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO), from the Safe Drinking Water Information System. See EPA's full report.
Recommended filters for TITUSVILLE
Filters matched to the specific contaminants in TITUSVILLE's water supply.
Filter certified for PFOA/PFOS (NSF/ANSI 53 or 58)
$180-$750Reverse osmosis and some carbon block filters reduce PFAS. Look for certification to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58 for PFOA/PFOS.
Carbon filter certified for VOCs (NSF/ANSI 53)
$180-$599Activated carbon is effective for disinfection byproducts. Look for NSF/ANSI 53 VOC reduction.
Reverse osmosis certified for arsenic (NSF/ANSI 58)
$429-$599Reverse osmosis certified under NSF/ANSI 58 for arsenic is the most reliable home option.
Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.
All contaminants detected in TITUSVILLE's tap water
Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →
| Contaminant | Detected | EWG US health-based |
EPA US legal |
EU DWD Europe |
WHO global |
CA PHG strictest US |
Tested sample year |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9) Disinfection byproduct |
33.9 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 564× over |
| Arsenic Heavy metal |
0.9 ppb | 0.004 | 10.0 | 10 | 10 | 0.004 | — | 225× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Disinfection byproduct |
14.0 ppb | 0.1 | 60.0 | 60 | — | — | — | 140× over |
| Bromodichloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
5.28 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 88× over |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Disinfection byproduct |
12.4 ppb | 0.15 | 80.0 | 100 | — | — | — | 83× over |
| Dibromoacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
1.54 ppb | 0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | 51× over |
| Dichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
8.19 ppb | 0.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 41× over |
| Chloroform Disinfection byproduct |
15.8 ppb | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 39× over |
| Dibromochloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
1.74 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 17× over |
| Trichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
1.73 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 17× over |
| Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) PFAS |
3.5 ppt | 0.3 | 4.0 | 100 | 100 | 1 | — | 12× over |
| Radium, combined (-226 and -228)* Radiological |
0.49 pCi/L | 0.05 | 5.0 | — | — | — | — | 9.8× over |
| Chromium (hexavalent) Heavy metal |
0.0933 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | 4.7× over |
| Chlorate Disinfection byproduct |
236.0 ppb | 210.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.1× over |
| Bromate* Disinfection byproduct |
0.0629 ppb | 0.1 | 10.0 | 10 | 10 | 0.1 | — | Below guideline |
| Nitrate Inorganic |
0.075 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | Below guideline |
| Bromochloromethane Other |
0.0163 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Bromoform Disinfection byproduct |
0.026 ppb | 0.5 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Aluminum Heavy metal |
28.0 ppb | 600.0 | — | 200 | — | 600 | — | Below guideline |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate* Semi-volatile organic compound |
0.132 ppb | 3.0 | 6.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Monochloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
1.54 ppb | 53.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Vanadium Other |
0.584 ppb | 21.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Monobromoacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
0.365 ppb | 25.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Barium Heavy metal |
4.0 ppb | 700.0 | 2000.0 | — | 1300 | 2000 | — | Below guideline |
| Manganese Heavy metal |
0.29 ppb | 100.0 | — | 50 | 80 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Molybdenum Other |
0.0833 ppb | 40.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Strontium Radiological |
0.566 ppb | 1500.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Fluoride Inorganic |
0.57 ppm | — | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Lithium Other |
5.0 ppb | — | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Nitrite Inorganic |
0.023 ppm | — | 1.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.
Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.
Treatment plant contact info
For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from TITUSVILLE, CITY OF.