Tap Water Quality Report
Tap water quality in WINTER PARK, Florida
Tap water in WINTER PARK, Florida receives a grade of C (73/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by WINTER PARK, CITY OF (3 WPS). The most significant water quality concerns are: Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.
What's in WINTER PARK's tap water
Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utility serving WINTER PARK.
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 35.9 ppb, 599x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs) detected at 64.4 ppb, 429x above the EWG health guideline of 0.15 ppb.
Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 24.1 ppb, 241x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.
Recommended filters for WINTER PARK
Filters matched to the specific contaminants in WINTER PARK's water supply.
Carbon block (NSF/ANSI 42 + 53)
$40-$750Activated carbon is highly effective for disinfection byproducts like TTHM and HAA5.
Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.
All contaminants detected in WINTER PARK's tap water
Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →
| Contaminant | Detected | EWG US health-based |
EPA US legal |
EU DWD Europe |
WHO global |
CA PHG strictest US |
Tested sample year |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9) Disinfection byproduct |
35.9 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 599× over |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Disinfection byproduct |
64.4 ppb | 0.15 | 80.0 | 100 | — | — | — | 429× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Disinfection byproduct |
24.1 ppb | 0.1 | 60.0 | 60 | — | — | — | 241× over |
| Bromate Disinfection byproduct |
4.28 ppb | 0.1 | 10.0 | 10 | 10 | 0.1 | — | 43× over |
| Chromium (hexavalent) Heavy metal |
0.13 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | 6.5× over |
| Chlorate Disinfection byproduct |
249.7 ppb | 210.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.2× over |
| Nitrate Inorganic |
0.0279 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | Below guideline |
| Molybdenum Other |
1.88 ppb | 40.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Other |
0.0355 ppb | 2.0 | 50.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Barium Heavy metal |
12.0 ppb | 700.0 | 2000.0 | — | 1300 | 2000 | — | Below guideline |
| Aluminum Heavy metal |
2.87 ppb | 600.0 | — | 200 | — | 600 | — | Below guideline |
| Manganese Heavy metal |
0.46 ppb | 100.0 | — | 50 | 80 | — | — | Below guideline |
| 2,4-D Pesticide/Herbicide |
0.045 ppb | 20.0 | 70.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Strontium Radiological |
0.198 ppb | 1500.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Dalapon Pesticide/Herbicide |
0.0967 ppb | — | 200.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Fluoride Inorganic |
0.56 ppm | — | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | — | Below guideline |
All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.
Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.
Treatment plant contact info
For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from WINTER PARK, CITY OF (3 WPS).