Tap Water Quality Report
Tap water quality in WINTER PK/CASSELBERY, Florida
Tap water in WINTER PK/CASSELBERY, Florida receives a grade of C (74/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by SEMINOLE COUNTY SOUTHEAST. The most significant water quality concerns are: Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.
What's in WINTER PK/CASSELBERY's tap water
Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utility serving WINTER PK/CASSELBERY.
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 26.9 ppb, 448x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs) detected at 45.4 ppb, 303x above the EWG health guideline of 0.15 ppb.
Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 24.1 ppb, 241x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.
Recommended filters for WINTER PK/CASSELBERY
Filters matched to the specific contaminants in WINTER PK/CASSELBERY's water supply.
Carbon block (NSF/ANSI 42 + 53)
$40-$750Activated carbon is highly effective for disinfection byproducts like TTHM and HAA5.
Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.
All contaminants detected in WINTER PK/CASSELBERY's tap water
Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →
| Contaminant | Detected | EWG US health-based |
EPA US legal |
EU DWD Europe |
WHO global |
CA PHG strictest US |
Tested sample year |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9) Disinfection byproduct |
26.9 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 448× over |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Disinfection byproduct |
45.4 ppb | 0.15 | 80.0 | 100 | — | — | — | 303× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Disinfection byproduct |
24.1 ppb | 0.1 | 60.0 | 60 | — | — | — | 241× over |
| Radium, combined (-226 and -228) Radiological |
0.38 pCi/L | 0.05 | 5.0 | — | — | — | — | 7.6× over |
| Chromium (hexavalent) Heavy metal |
0.075 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.8× over |
| Chlorate Disinfection byproduct |
447.3 ppb | 210.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 2.1× over |
| Bromochloromethane Other |
0.0767 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.3× over |
| Nitrate Inorganic |
0.151 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | 1.1× over |
| Manganese Heavy metal |
5.38 ppb | 100.0 | — | 50 | 80 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Barium Heavy metal |
10.0 ppb | 700.0 | 2000.0 | — | 1300 | 2000 | — | Below guideline |
| Molybdenum Other |
0.533 ppb | 40.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Vanadium Other |
0.189 ppb | 21.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Strontium Radiological |
0.118 ppb | 1500.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| 2-Methoxyethanol Other |
0.968 ppb | — | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Fluoride Inorganic |
0.68 ppm | — | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Nitrite Inorganic |
0.0152 ppm | — | 1.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.
Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.
Treatment plant contact info
For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from SEMINOLE COUNTY SOUTHEAST.