Tap Water Quality Report

Tap water quality in CUMMING, Georgia

Served by 2 public water systems. 219,861 residents.

Average score 67/100
Utilities 2
Population 219,861
D
67/100
Below Average
ⓘ How did we get this rating?
Quick answer

Tap water in CUMMING, Georgia receives a grade of D (67/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by 2 public water systems, primarily CUMMING. The most significant water quality concerns are: Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline; Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.

Data sources for this grade: utilities.csv EWG Tap Water Database ⓘ How did we get this rating?

What's in CUMMING's tap water

Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utilities serving CUMMING.

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 33.0 ppb, 550x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.

Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Haloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 25.7 ppb, 257x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) detected at 26.9 ppb, 180x above the EWG health guideline of 0.15 ppb.

Recommended filters for CUMMING

Filters matched to the specific contaminants in CUMMING's water supply.

Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.

All contaminants detected in CUMMING's tap water

Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →

Contaminant Detected EWG
US health-based
EPA
US legal
EU DWD
Europe
WHO
global
CA PHG
strictest US
Tested
sample year
Status
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)
Disinfection byproduct
33.8 ppb 0.06 563× over
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Disinfection byproduct
27.3 ppb 0.1 60.0 60 273× over
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Disinfection byproduct
35.5 ppb 0.15 80.0 100 237× over
Trichloroacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
13.6 ppb 0.1 136× over
Dichloroacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
15.9 ppb 0.2 79× over
Chloroform
Disinfection byproduct
29.3 ppb 0.4 73× over
Bromodichloromethane
Disinfection byproduct
3.59 ppb 0.06 60× over
Dibromochloromethane
Disinfection byproduct
1.06 ppb 0.1 11× over
Nitrate and nitrite
Inorganic
1.08 ppm 0.14 10.0 11.3 11.3 10 7.7× over
Chromium (hexavalent)
Heavy metal
0.106 ppb 0.02 5.3× over
Chlorate
Disinfection byproduct
144.1 ppb 210.0 Below guideline
Dibromoacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
0.0144 ppb 0.03 Below guideline
Vanadium
Other
0.25 ppb 21.0 Below guideline
Manganese
Heavy metal
0.802 ppb 100.0 50 80 Below guideline
Monochloroacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
0.346 ppb 53.0 Below guideline
Perfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA)
PFAS
0.975 ppt 1000.0 Below guideline
Monobromoacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
0.02 ppb 25.0 Below guideline
Strontium
Radiological
0.0269 ppb 1500.0 Below guideline
Fluoride
Inorganic
0.697 ppm 4.0 1.5 1.5 Below guideline

All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.

Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.

Treatment plant contact info

For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from CUMMING.

Treatment Plant

FacilityCUMMING WATER PLANT

ZIP codes served

CUMMING's public water systems serve the following ZIP codes: