Tap Water Quality Report

Tap water quality in FREDERICK, Maryland

Served by 2 public water systems. 128,911 residents.

Average score 64/100
Utilities 2
Population 128,911
D
64/100
Below Average
ⓘ How did we get this rating?
Quick answer

Tap water in FREDERICK, Maryland receives a grade of D (64/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by 2 public water systems, primarily NEW DESIGN - FREDERICK COUNTY. The most significant water quality concerns are: Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.

Data sources for this grade: utilities.csv EWG Tap Water Database ⓘ How did we get this rating?

What's in FREDERICK's tap water

Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utilities serving FREDERICK.

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 28.8 ppb, 480x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) detected at 49.0 ppb, 326x above the EWG health guideline of 0.15 ppb.

Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Haloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 24.2 ppb, 242x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.

Recommended filters for FREDERICK

Filters matched to the specific contaminants in FREDERICK's water supply.

Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.

All contaminants detected in FREDERICK's tap water

Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →

Contaminant Detected EWG
US health-based
EPA
US legal
EU DWD
Europe
WHO
global
CA PHG
strictest US
Tested
sample year
Status
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)
Disinfection byproduct
41.5 ppb 0.06 692× over
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Disinfection byproduct
38.5 ppb 0.1 60.0 60 385× over
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Disinfection byproduct
50.4 ppb 0.15 80.0 100 336× over
Bromochloroacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
4.56 ppb 0.02 228× over
Bromodichloromethane
Disinfection byproduct
6.14 ppb 0.06 102× over
Chloroform
Disinfection byproduct
13.9 ppb 0.4 35× over
Dibromochloromethane
Disinfection byproduct
3.08 ppb 0.1 31× over
Nitrate and nitrite
Inorganic
1.61 ppm 0.14 10.0 11.3 11.3 10 12× over
Chromium (hexavalent)
Heavy metal
0.201 ppb 0.02 10× over
Bromochloromethane
Other
0.579 ppb 0.06 9.7× over
Nitrate
Inorganic
0.35 ppm 0.14 10.0 11.3 11.3 10 2.5× over
Bromoform
Disinfection byproduct
1.01 ppb 0.5 2.0× over
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Radiological
0.1 pCi/L 0.05 5.0 2.0× over
Chlorate
Disinfection byproduct
191.5 ppb 210.0 Below guideline
Atrazine
Pesticide/Herbicide
0.086 ppb 0.1 3.0 0.1 100 0.15 Below guideline
Chloromethane
Other
1.86 ppb 2.69 Below guideline
Manganese
Heavy metal
7.04 ppb 100.0 50 80 Below guideline
Barium
Heavy metal
22.6 ppb 700.0 2000.0 1300 2000 Below guideline
Vanadium
Other
0.195 ppb 21.0 Below guideline
Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA)
PFAS
0.258 ppt 1000.0 Below guideline
Strontium
Radiological
0.193 ppb 1500.0 Below guideline
Fluoride
Inorganic
0.572 ppm 4.0 1.5 1.5 Below guideline
Bromomethane
Other
0.0871 ppb Below guideline
Chloroethane
Other
3.25 ppb Below guideline

All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.

Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.

Treatment plant contact info

For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from NEW DESIGN - FREDERICK COUNTY.

Treatment Plant

FacilityNEW DESIGN PLANT 1 + 2

ZIP codes served

FREDERICK's public water systems serve the following ZIP codes: