Free tap water grades for 1,100+ water systems & 10,000+ ZIP codesFree tap water grades for 10,000+ ZIP codes Official EPA compliance records · Independent ratings

Tap Water Quality Report

Tap water quality in ST. CHARLES, Missouri

Served by ST CHARLES PWS. 73,040 residents.

Average score 70/100
Utilities 1
Population 73,040
Quick answer

Tap water in ST. CHARLES, Missouri receives a grade of C (70/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by ST CHARLES PWS. The most significant water quality concerns are: Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Arsenic* significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.

Data sources for this grade: utilities.csv EWG Tap Water Database ⓘ How did we get this rating?

What's in ST. CHARLES's tap water

Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utility serving ST. CHARLES.

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 17.8 ppb, 296x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.

Arsenic* significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Arsenic* detected at 0.736 ppb, 184x above the EWG health guideline of 0.004 ppb.

Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Haloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 11.0 ppb, 110x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.

EPA compliance record

Official U.S. EPA records for ST CHARLES PWS (system ID MO6010707) for the last 3 years. Checked 2026-10-07.

No health-based violations. EPA recorded 3 quarters with a testing, reporting or notice violation.
3 of 12quarters with a violation
Nolead above EPA action level
10/11/2024last state inspection
RuleTypeSinceStatus
Lead and Copper Rule Missed testing or reporting 10/01/2024 Open

Source: U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO), from the Safe Drinking Water Information System. See EPA's full report.

Recommended filters for ST. CHARLES

Filters matched to the specific contaminants in ST. CHARLES's water supply.

Carbon filter certified for VOCs (NSF/ANSI 53)

$180-$599

Activated carbon is effective for disinfection byproducts. Look for NSF/ANSI 53 VOC reduction.

Aquasana AQ-5300 Under-Sink Filter
$180-$240 NSF 42, 53, 401, 372
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
AquaTru Countertop Reverse Osmosis
$449-$599 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401, 372
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
Aquasana OptimH2O Reverse Osmosis + Claryum
$429-$549 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon

Reverse osmosis certified for arsenic (NSF/ANSI 58)

$429-$599

Reverse osmosis certified under NSF/ANSI 58 for arsenic is the most reliable home option.

AquaTru Countertop Reverse Osmosis
$449-$599 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401, 372
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
Aquasana OptimH2O Reverse Osmosis + Claryum
$429-$549 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon

Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.

All contaminants detected in ST. CHARLES's tap water

Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →

🇪🇺
ST. CHARLES's tap water would fail European Union drinking water standards. One or more detected contaminants exceed EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184 limits, even though they may be fully legal under US EPA rules. View the standards we compare against →
Contaminant Detected EWG
US health-based
EPA
US legal
EU DWD
Europe
WHO
global
CA PHG
strictest US
Tested
sample year
Status
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)
Disinfection byproduct
17.8 ppb 0.06 — — — — — 296× over
Arsenic*
Heavy metal
0.736 ppb 0.004 10.0 10 10 0.004 — 184× over
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Disinfection byproduct
11.0 ppb 0.1 60.0 60 — — — 110× over
Bromochloroacetic acid*
Disinfection byproduct
2.03 ppb 0.02 — — — — — 102× over
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Disinfection byproduct
9.11 ppb 0.15 80.0 100 — — — 61× over
Chromium (hexavalent)
Heavy metal
1.2 ppb 0.02 — — — — — 60× over
Dichloroacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
10.2 ppb 0.2 — — — — — 51× over
Chloroform
Disinfection byproduct
7.65 ppb 0.4 — — — — — 19× over
Bromodichloromethane
Disinfection byproduct
0.874 ppb 0.06 — — — — — 15× over
Trichloroacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
0.793 ppb 0.1 — — — — — 7.9× over
Nitrate*
Inorganic
1.02 ppm 0.14 10.0 11.3 11.3 10 — 7.3× over
Atrazine*
Pesticide/Herbicide
0.2 ppb 0.1 3.0 0.1 100 0.15 — Fails EU
Dibromoacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
0.036 ppb 0.03 — — — — — 1.2× over
Chlorate
Disinfection byproduct
190.0 ppb 210.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Dibromochloromethane
Disinfection byproduct
0.0551 ppb 0.1 — — — — — Below guideline
Antimony*
Heavy metal
0.315 ppb 1.0 6.0 10 20 1 — Below guideline
Barium
Heavy metal
99.3 ppb 700.0 2000.0 — 1300 2000 — Below guideline
Nitrate and nitrite
Inorganic
0.0147 ppm 0.14 10.0 11.3 11.3 10 — Below guideline
1,4-Dioxane*
Semi-volatile organic compound
0.0288 ppb 0.35 — — 50 1 — Below guideline
Vanadium
Other
1.34 ppb 21.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Selenium*
Heavy metal
1.64 ppb 30.0 50.0 20 40 30 — Below guideline
Monochloroacetic acid*
Disinfection byproduct
2.41 ppb 53.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Molybdenum
Other
1.05 ppb 40.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Manganese
Heavy metal
1.83 ppb 100.0 — 50 80 — — Below guideline
Monobromoacetic acid*
Disinfection byproduct
0.157 ppb 25.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Aluminum*
Heavy metal
2.15 ppb 600.0 — 200 — 600 — Below guideline
Strontium
Radiological
0.165 ppb 1500.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Chromium (total)*
Heavy metal
1.38 ppb — 100.0 — — — — Below guideline
Fluoride
Inorganic
0.466 ppm — 4.0 1.5 1.5 — — Below guideline
Lithium
Other
20.9 ppb — — — — — — Below guideline
Nitrite*
Inorganic
0.0263 ppm — 1.0 — — — — Below guideline

All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.

Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.

Treatment plant contact info

For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from ST CHARLES PWS.

Treatment Plant

FacilityELM POINT PLANT

ZIP codes served

ST. CHARLES's public water systems serve the following ZIP codes: