Tap Water Quality Report
Tap water quality in GASTONIA, North Carolina
Tap water in GASTONIA, North Carolina receives a grade of D (61/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by TWO RIVERS UTILITIES. The most significant water quality concerns are: PFAS contamination; Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline; Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.
What's in GASTONIA's tap water
Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utility serving GASTONIA.
PFAS contamination
Severe concernPerfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) detected. PFAS are persistent chemicals linked to cancer and immune effects with no known safe exposure threshold.
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 39.7 ppb, 662x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 26.7 ppb, 267x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs) detected at 35.0 ppb, 233x above the EWG health guideline of 0.15 ppb.
Recommended filters for GASTONIA
Filters matched to the specific contaminants in GASTONIA's water supply.
Reverse Osmosis or NSF P473 certified carbon
$80-$750Activated carbon and RO are the only technologies proven to remove PFAS at certified levels.
Carbon block (NSF/ANSI 42 + 53)
$40-$750Activated carbon is highly effective for disinfection byproducts like TTHM and HAA5.
Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.
All contaminants detected in GASTONIA's tap water
Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →
| Contaminant | Detected | EWG US health-based |
EPA US legal |
EU DWD Europe |
WHO global |
CA PHG strictest US |
Tested sample year |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9) Disinfection byproduct |
39.7 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 662× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Disinfection byproduct |
26.7 ppb | 0.1 | 60.0 | 60 | — | — | — | 267× over |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Disinfection byproduct |
35.0 ppb | 0.15 | 80.0 | 100 | — | — | — | 233× over |
| Trichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
13.8 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 138× over |
| Bromodichloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
8.02 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 134× over |
| Dichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
12.7 ppb | 0.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 63× over |
| Chloroform Disinfection byproduct |
24.8 ppb | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 62× over |
| Dibromochloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
1.84 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 18× over |
| Chromium (hexavalent) Heavy metal |
0.0713 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.6× over |
| Dibromoacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
0.0768 ppb | 0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | 2.6× over |
| Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) PFAS |
0.22 ppt | 0.3 | 4.0 | 100 | 100 | 1 | — | Below guideline |
| Chlorate Disinfection byproduct |
106.4 ppb | 210.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Vanadium Other |
0.25 ppb | 21.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Monochloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
0.346 ppb | 53.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Manganese Heavy metal |
0.179 ppb | 100.0 | — | 50 | 80 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Strontium Radiological |
0.0311 ppb | 1500.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Fluoride Inorganic |
0.05 ppm | — | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | — | Below guideline |
All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.
Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.
Treatment plant contact info
For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from TWO RIVERS UTILITIES.