Free tap water grades for 1,100+ water systems & 10,000+ ZIP codesFree tap water grades for 10,000+ ZIP codes Official EPA compliance records · Independent ratings

Tap Water Quality Report

Tap water quality in Tulsa, Oklahoma

Served by TULSA. 413,000 residents.

Average score 77/100
Utilities 1
Population 413,000
Quick answer

Tap water in Tulsa, Oklahoma receives a grade of C (77/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by TULSA. The most significant water quality concerns are: Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.

Data sources for this grade: utilities.csv EWG Tap Water Database ⓘ How did we get this rating?

What's in Tulsa's tap water

Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utility serving Tulsa.

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 25.6 ppb, 427x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) detected at 34.8 ppb, 232x above the EWG health guideline of 0.15 ppb.

Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Haloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 18.0 ppb, 180x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.

EPA compliance record

Official U.S. EPA records for TULSA (system ID OK1020418) for the last 3 years. Checked 2026-10-07.

No EPA violations in the last 3 years.
0 of 12quarters with a violation
Nolead above EPA action level
11/18/2024last state inspection

Source: U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO), from the Safe Drinking Water Information System. See EPA's full report.

Recommended filters for Tulsa

Filters matched to the specific contaminants in Tulsa's water supply.

Carbon filter certified for VOCs (NSF/ANSI 53)

$180-$599

Activated carbon is effective for disinfection byproducts. Look for NSF/ANSI 53 VOC reduction.

Aquasana AQ-5300 Under-Sink Filter
$180-$240 NSF 42, 53, 401, 372
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
AquaTru Countertop Reverse Osmosis
$449-$599 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401, 372
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
Aquasana OptimH2O Reverse Osmosis + Claryum
$429-$549 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon

Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.

All contaminants detected in Tulsa's tap water

Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →

🇪🇺
Tulsa's tap water would fail European Union drinking water standards. One or more detected contaminants exceed EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184 limits, even though they may be fully legal under US EPA rules. View the standards we compare against →
Contaminant Detected EWG
US health-based
EPA
US legal
EU DWD
Europe
WHO
global
CA PHG
strictest US
Tested
sample year
Status
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)
Disinfection byproduct
25.6 ppb 0.06 — — — — — 427× over
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Disinfection byproduct
34.8 ppb 0.15 80.0 100 — — — 232× over
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Disinfection byproduct
18.0 ppb 0.1 60.0 60 — — — 180× over
Bromodichloromethane
Disinfection byproduct
10.4 ppb 0.06 — — — — — 173× over
Trichloroacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
6.46 ppb 0.1 — — — — — 65× over
Dichloroacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
9.79 ppb 0.2 — — — — — 49× over
Chloroform
Disinfection byproduct
19.3 ppb 0.4 — — — — — 48× over
Dibromochloromethane
Disinfection byproduct
4.71 ppb 0.1 — — — — — 47× over
Dibromoacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
1.3 ppb 0.03 — — — — — 43× over
Chlorite
Disinfection byproduct
206.2 ppb 50.0 1000.0 — — — — 4.1× over
Atrazine
Pesticide/Herbicide
0.3 ppb 0.1 3.0 0.1 100 0.15 — Fails EU
Nitrate and nitrite
Inorganic
0.299 ppm 0.14 10.0 11.3 11.3 10 — 2.1× over
Chromium (hexavalent)
Heavy metal
0.0112 ppb 0.02 — — — — — Below guideline
Bromoform
Disinfection byproduct
0.211 ppb 0.5 — — — — — Below guideline
Chlorate
Disinfection byproduct
79.3 ppb 210.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Bromochloromethane
Other
0.0203 ppb 0.06 — — — — — Below guideline
Barium
Heavy metal
42.2 ppb 700.0 2000.0 — 1300 2000 — Below guideline
Vanadium
Other
0.568 ppb 21.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Monochloroacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
0.384 ppb 53.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Monobromoacetic acid
Disinfection byproduct
0.0953 ppb 25.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Molybdenum
Other
0.138 ppb 40.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Manganese
Heavy metal
0.216 ppb 100.0 — 50 80 — — Below guideline
Strontium
Radiological
0.157 ppb 1500.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Fluoride
Inorganic
0.727 ppm — 4.0 1.5 1.5 — — Below guideline

All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.

Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.

Treatment plant contact info

For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from TULSA.

Treatment Plant

FacilityTULSA MOHAWK WTP