Water Quality Report · Updated May 12, 2026
BJW&SA (0720003)
BJW&SA (0720003) delivers tap water graded F (51/100) by TapWaterSafety.org. The utility serves approximately 145,634 residents in OKATIE, South Carolina using surface water. The most significant water quality concerns are: PFAS contamination; Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline; Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline. For questions, the utility can be reached at 843-987-9200.
Is OKATIE tap water safe to drink?
BJW&SA (0720003) delivers tap water that earns a grade of F (51/100) from TapWaterSafety.org — a poor rating, with significant contamination concerns and/or recent violations.
The utility serves 145,634 residents in OKATIE, drawing from surface water.
Public testing data identifies 12 contaminants in this water above EWG's health-based guidelines, including: Haloacetic acids (HAA9), Haloacetic acids (HAA5), Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs), Trichloroacetic acid, Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic acid, Chloroform, Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), Dibromochloromethane, Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), Chromium (hexavalent), Chlorate. For most residents, a properly certified home filter at the kitchen tap is the most cost-effective way to reduce exposure to whatever's in your water. See our filter recommendations below, matched specifically to this utility's contaminant profile.
Quick actions for OKATIE residents
Top concerns in this water
Based on the most recent EPA and EWG data, these are the most significant water quality issues for BJW&SA (0720003).
PFAS contamination
Severe concernPerfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) detected. PFAS are persistent chemicals linked to cancer and immune effects with no known safe exposure threshold.
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 47.5 ppb, 791x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 32.7 ppb, 327x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs) detected at 40.8 ppb, 272x above the EWG health guideline of 0.15 ppb.
Contact BJW&SA (0720003)
Reach the utility directly for service issues, water quality concerns, or to request your Consumer Confidence Report.
General Contact
Treatment Plant
Recommended water filters for OKATIE
Filters matched to the specific contaminants in this water supply.
Reverse Osmosis or NSF P473 certified carbon
$80-$750Activated carbon and RO are the only technologies proven to remove PFAS at certified levels.
Carbon block (NSF/ANSI 42 + 53)
$40-$750Activated carbon is highly effective for disinfection byproducts like TTHM and HAA5.
Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.
Score breakdown
This utility's overall score of 51/100 breaks down across five weighted components. Read the full methodology →
Contaminants detected — international standards comparison
Every contaminant detected, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal (the strictest US benchmark). Why we show multiple standards →
| Contaminant | Detected | EWG US health-based |
EPA US legal |
EU DWD Europe |
WHO global |
CA PHG strictest US |
Tested sample year |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9) Disinfection byproduct |
47.5 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 791× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Disinfection byproduct |
32.7 ppb | 0.1 | 60.0 | 60 | — | — | — | 327× over |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Disinfection byproduct |
40.8 ppb | 0.15 | 80.0 | 100 | — | — | — | 272× over |
| Trichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
14.7 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 147× over |
| Bromodichloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
8.44 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 141× over |
| Dichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
17.9 ppb | 0.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 89× over |
| Chloroform Disinfection byproduct |
30.7 ppb | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 77× over |
| Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) PFAS |
1.94 ppt | 0.09 | 4.0 | 100 | 100 | 0.007 | — | 22× over |
| Dibromochloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
1.61 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 16× over |
| Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) PFAS |
2.13 ppt | 0.3 | 4.0 | 100 | 100 | 1 | — | 7.1× over |
| Chromium (hexavalent) Heavy metal |
0.101 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | 5.0× over |
| Chlorate Disinfection byproduct |
231.3 ppb | 210.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.1× over |
| Nitrate Inorganic |
0.103 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | Below guideline |
| 1,4-Dioxane Semi-volatile organic compound |
0.0488 ppb | 0.35 | — | — | 50 | 1 | — | Below guideline |
| Nitrate and nitrite Inorganic |
0.00917 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | Below guideline |
| Manganese Heavy metal |
6.16 ppb | 100.0 | — | 50 | 80 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Molybdenum Other |
1.38 ppb | 40.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Bromoform Disinfection byproduct |
0.0106 ppb | 0.5 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Vanadium Other |
0.271 ppb | 21.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Monochloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
0.14 ppb | 53.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) PFAS |
1.69 ppt | 2000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA) PFAS |
0.582 ppt | 1000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA) PFAS |
0.578 ppt | 1000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Strontium Radiological |
0.0514 ppb | 1500.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Fluoride Inorganic |
0.632 ppm | — | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | — | Below guideline |
All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.
Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines (4th ed.), California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.
BJW&SA (0720003) service area
This water system serves 1 community in Beaufort County, South Carolina. Click any city for its dedicated tap water quality page.
Find the right filter for OKATIE water
Browse filter categories by water-quality concern. Each option below is NSF-certified for the matched contaminant type.