Free tap water grades for 1,100+ water systems & 10,000+ ZIP codesFree tap water grades for 10,000+ ZIP codes Official EPA compliance records · Independent ratings

Tap Water Quality Report

Tap water quality in JACKSON, Tennessee

Served by JACKSON WATER SYSTEM. 91,111 residents.

Average score 76/100
Utilities 1
Population 91,111
Quick answer

Tap water in JACKSON, Tennessee receives a grade of C (76/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by JACKSON WATER SYSTEM. The most significant water quality concerns are: PFAS contamination; Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) significantly above health guideline; Arsenic significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.

Data sources for this grade: utilities.csv EWG Tap Water Database ⓘ How did we get this rating?

What's in JACKSON's tap water

Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utility serving JACKSON.

PFAS contamination

Severe concern

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) detected. PFAS are persistent chemicals linked to cancer and immune effects with no known safe exposure threshold.

Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) detected at 8.15 ppt, 8150x above the EWG health guideline of 0.001 ppt.

Arsenic significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Arsenic detected at 0.4 ppb, 100x above the EWG health guideline of 0.004 ppb.

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline

Moderate concern

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 4.07 ppb, 68x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.

EPA compliance record

Official U.S. EPA records for JACKSON WATER SYSTEM (system ID TN0000299) for the last 3 years. Checked 2026-10-07.

No EPA violations in the last 3 years.
0 of 12quarters with a violation
Nolead above EPA action level

Source: U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO), from the Safe Drinking Water Information System. See EPA's full report.

Recommended filters for JACKSON

Filters matched to the specific contaminants in JACKSON's water supply.

Filter certified for PFOA/PFOS (NSF/ANSI 53 or 58)

$180-$750

Reverse osmosis and some carbon block filters reduce PFAS. Look for certification to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58 for PFOA/PFOS.

AquaTru Countertop Reverse Osmosis
$449-$599 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401, 372
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
Aquasana AQ-5300 Under-Sink Filter
$180-$240 NSF 42, 53, 401, 372
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
Aquasana OptimH2O Reverse Osmosis + Claryum
$429-$549 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
Waterdrop G3P800 Tankless RO
$600-$750 NSF 42, 53, 58, 372
View on retailer →

Reverse osmosis certified for arsenic (NSF/ANSI 58)

$429-$599

Reverse osmosis certified under NSF/ANSI 58 for arsenic is the most reliable home option.

AquaTru Countertop Reverse Osmosis
$449-$599 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401, 372
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
Aquasana OptimH2O Reverse Osmosis + Claryum
$429-$549 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon

Carbon filter certified for VOCs (NSF/ANSI 53)

$180-$599

Activated carbon is effective for disinfection byproducts. Look for NSF/ANSI 53 VOC reduction.

Aquasana AQ-5300 Under-Sink Filter
$180-$240 NSF 42, 53, 401, 372
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
AquaTru Countertop Reverse Osmosis
$449-$599 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401, 372
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon
Aquasana OptimH2O Reverse Osmosis + Claryum
$429-$549 NSF 42, 53, 58, 401
Editorial pick · affiliate link coming soon

Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.

All contaminants detected in JACKSON's tap water

Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →

Contaminant Detected EWG
US health-based
EPA
US legal
EU DWD
Europe
WHO
global
CA PHG
strictest US
Tested
sample year
Status
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
PFAS
5.2 ppt 0.3 4.0 100 100 1 — EPA violation
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)
PFAS
8.15 ppt 0.001 10.0 — — — — 8150× over
Arsenic
Heavy metal
0.4 ppb 0.004 10.0 10 10 0.004 — 100× over
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)
Disinfection byproduct
4.07 ppb 0.06 — — — — — 68× over
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Disinfection byproduct
7.7 ppb 0.15 80.0 100 — — — 51× over
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Disinfection byproduct
1.75 ppb 0.1 60.0 60 — — — 18× over
Nitrate
Inorganic
1.94 ppm 0.14 10.0 11.3 11.3 10 — 14× over
Nitrate and nitrite
Inorganic
1.9 ppm 0.14 10.0 11.3 11.3 10 — 14× over
Chromium (hexavalent)
Heavy metal
0.21 ppb 0.02 — — — — — 11× over
Tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene)
Volatile organic compound
0.303 ppb 0.06 5.0 — — — — 5.0× over
Dibromochloromethane
Disinfection byproduct
0.353 ppb 0.1 — — — — — 3.5× over
Bromodichloromethane
Disinfection byproduct
0.0333 ppb 0.06 — — — — — Below guideline
1,4-Dioxane
Semi-volatile organic compound
0.025 ppb 0.35 — — 50 1 — Below guideline
Barium
Heavy metal
33.0 ppb 700.0 2000.0 — 1300 2000 — Below guideline
Chlorate
Disinfection byproduct
8.71 ppb 210.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Chloroform
Disinfection byproduct
0.0119 ppb 0.4 — — — — — Below guideline
Bromoform
Disinfection byproduct
0.0119 ppb 0.5 — — — — — Below guideline
Manganese
Heavy metal
0.585 ppb 100.0 — 50 80 — — Below guideline
Vanadium
Other
0.113 ppb 21.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
PFAS
1.8 ppt 2000.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Strontium
Radiological
0.066 ppb 1500.0 — — — — — Below guideline
Fluoride
Inorganic
0.75 ppm — 4.0 1.5 1.5 — — Below guideline

All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.

Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.

Treatment plant contact info

For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from JACKSON WATER SYSTEM.

Treatment Plant

FacilityNORTH PLANT

ZIP codes served

JACKSON's public water systems serve the following ZIP codes: