Tap Water Quality Report
Tap water quality in EULESS, Texas
Tap water in EULESS, Texas receives a grade of C (72/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by CITY OF EULESS. The most significant water quality concerns are: Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline; Bromodichloromethane significantly above health guideline; Arsenic detected. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.
What's in EULESS's tap water
Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utility serving EULESS.
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 15.1 ppb, 251x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs) detected at 31.6 ppb, 211x above the EWG health guideline of 0.15 ppb.
Bromodichloromethane significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernBromodichloromethane detected at 11.3 ppb, 188x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Arsenic detected
Moderate concernArsenic detected at 0.2 ppb.
EPA compliance record
Official U.S. EPA records for CITY OF EULESS (system ID TX2200031) for the last 3 years. Checked 2026-10-07.
Source: U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO), from the Safe Drinking Water Information System. See EPA's full report.
Recommended filters for EULESS
Filters matched to the specific contaminants in EULESS's water supply.
Carbon filter certified for VOCs (NSF/ANSI 53)
$180-$599Activated carbon is effective for disinfection byproducts. Look for NSF/ANSI 53 VOC reduction.
Reverse osmosis certified for arsenic (NSF/ANSI 58)
$429-$599Reverse osmosis certified under NSF/ANSI 58 for arsenic is the most reliable home option.
Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.
All contaminants detected in EULESS's tap water
Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →
| Contaminant | Detected | EWG US health-based |
EPA US legal |
EU DWD Europe |
WHO global |
CA PHG strictest US |
Tested sample year |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9) Disinfection byproduct |
15.1 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 251× over |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Disinfection byproduct |
31.6 ppb | 0.15 | 80.0 | 100 | — | — | — | 211× over |
| Bromodichloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
11.3 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 188× over |
| Bromochloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
3.68 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | 184× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Disinfection byproduct |
12.4 ppb | 0.1 | 60.0 | 60 | — | — | — | 124× over |
| Dibromochloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
5.83 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 58× over |
| Arsenic Heavy metal |
0.2 ppb | 0.004 | 10.0 | 10 | 10 | 0.004 | — | 50× over |
| Dibromoacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
1.09 ppb | 0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | 36× over |
| Dichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
6.91 ppb | 0.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 35× over |
| Trichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
3.33 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 33× over |
| Chloroform Disinfection byproduct |
13.0 ppb | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 32× over |
| Bromate* Disinfection byproduct |
1.21 ppb | 0.1 | 10.0 | 10 | 10 | 0.1 | — | 12× over |
| Nitrate and nitrite Inorganic |
0.582 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | 4.2× over |
| Nitrate Inorganic |
0.145 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | 1.0× over |
| Simazine* Pesticide/Herbicide |
0.0767 ppb | 0.1 | 4.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Bromoform Disinfection byproduct |
0.284 ppb | 0.5 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Atrazine Pesticide/Herbicide |
0.0333 ppb | 0.1 | 3.0 | 0.1 | 100 | 0.15 | — | Below guideline |
| Chromium (hexavalent) Heavy metal |
0.00426 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Antimony Heavy metal |
0.2 ppb | 1.0 | 6.0 | 10 | 20 | 1 | — | Below guideline |
| Barium Heavy metal |
50.8 ppb | 700.0 | 2000.0 | — | 1300 | 2000 | — | Below guideline |
| Bromochloromethane Other |
0.0039 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Molybdenum Other |
2.19 ppb | 40.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Manganese Heavy metal |
2.13 ppb | 100.0 | — | 50 | 80 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Monochloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
1.03 ppb | 53.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Vanadium Other |
0.202 ppb | 21.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Aluminum Heavy metal |
2.78 ppb | 600.0 | — | 200 | — | 600 | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA) PFAS |
1.64 ppt | 1000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Monobromoacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
0.0385 ppb | 25.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA) PFAS |
1.21 ppt | 1000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA) PFAS |
1.13 ppt | 1000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) PFAS |
1.76 ppt | 2000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Strontium Radiological |
0.386 ppb | 1500.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Acetone Other |
2.72 ppb | — | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Chromium (total) Heavy metal |
0.78 ppb | — | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Cyanide Inorganic |
17.3 ppb | — | 200.0 | 50 | 70 | 150 | — | Below guideline |
| Fluoride Inorganic |
1.84 ppm | — | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | — | Fails EU |
| Germanium Other |
0.2 ppb | — | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Lithium Other |
31.8 ppb | — | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Methyl isobutyl ketone* Other |
0.243 ppb | — | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Nitrite Inorganic |
0.131 ppm | — | 1.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.
Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.
Treatment plant contact info
For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from CITY OF EULESS.