Tap Water Quality Report
Tap water quality in NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, Texas
Tap water in NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, Texas receives a grade of D (61/100) from TapWaterSafety.org. It's served by CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. The most significant water quality concerns are: PFAS contamination; Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Bromochloroacetic acid significantly above health guideline. Data sources: EPA SDWIS, EPA ECHO, EWG Tap Water Database.
What's in NORTH RICHLAND HILLS's tap water
Top water quality concerns identified by the EPA and Environmental Working Group across the utility serving NORTH RICHLAND HILLS.
PFAS contamination
Severe concernPerfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) detected. PFAS are persistent chemicals linked to cancer and immune effects with no known safe exposure threshold.
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernPerfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) detected at 1.58 ppt, 1583x above the EWG health guideline of 0.001 ppt.
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 25.5 ppb, 425x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Bromochloroacetic acid significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernBromochloroacetic acid detected at 4.81 ppb, 241x above the EWG health guideline of 0.02 ppb.
EPA compliance record
Official U.S. EPA records for CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (system ID TX2200063) for the last 3 years. Checked 2026-10-07.
Source: U.S. EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO), from the Safe Drinking Water Information System. See EPA's full report.
Recommended filters for NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Filters matched to the specific contaminants in NORTH RICHLAND HILLS's water supply.
Filter certified for PFOA/PFOS (NSF/ANSI 53 or 58)
$180-$750Reverse osmosis and some carbon block filters reduce PFAS. Look for certification to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58 for PFOA/PFOS.
Carbon filter certified for VOCs (NSF/ANSI 53)
$180-$599Activated carbon is effective for disinfection byproducts. Look for NSF/ANSI 53 VOC reduction.
Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.
All contaminants detected in NORTH RICHLAND HILLS's tap water
Every contaminant identified, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal. Why we show multiple standards →
| Contaminant | Detected | EWG US health-based |
EPA US legal |
EU DWD Europe |
WHO global |
CA PHG strictest US |
Tested sample year |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) PFAS |
1.58 ppt | 0.001 | 10.0 | — | — | — | — | 1583× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9) Disinfection byproduct |
25.5 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 425× over |
| Bromochloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
4.81 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | 241× over |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Disinfection byproduct |
32.7 ppb | 0.15 | 80.0 | 100 | — | — | — | 218× over |
| Bromodichloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
12.0 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 200× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Disinfection byproduct |
15.4 ppb | 0.1 | 60.0 | 60 | — | — | — | 154× over |
| Dibromochloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
6.32 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 63× over |
| Dibromoacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
1.54 ppb | 0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | 51× over |
| Dichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
9.31 ppb | 0.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 47× over |
| Chloroform Disinfection byproduct |
14.0 ppb | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 35× over |
| Trichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
3.17 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 32× over |
| Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) PFAS |
0.7 ppt | 0.09 | 4.0 | 100 | 100 | 0.007 | — | 7.8× over |
| Nitrate Inorganic |
0.494 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | 3.5× over |
| Nitrate and nitrite Inorganic |
0.317 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | 2.3× over |
| Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) PFAS |
0.7 ppt | 0.3 | 4.0 | 100 | 100 | 1 | — | 2.3× over |
| Chromium (hexavalent) Heavy metal |
0.0178 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Bromoform Disinfection byproduct |
0.434 ppb | 0.5 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Bromochloromethane Other |
0.0279 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Chlorate Disinfection byproduct |
28.8 ppb | 210.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Vanadium Other |
1.01 ppb | 21.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Molybdenum Other |
1.49 ppb | 40.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Manganese Heavy metal |
2.58 ppb | 100.0 | — | 50 | 80 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Monochloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
1.23 ppb | 53.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA) PFAS |
6.72 ppt | 1000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Monobromoacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
0.166 ppb | 25.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA) PFAS |
3.55 ppt | 1000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA) PFAS |
3.42 ppt | 1000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) PFAS |
2.78 ppt | 2000.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Strontium Radiological |
0.27 ppb | 1500.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.
Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines, California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.
Treatment plant contact info
For service issues, water quality concerns, or to request a Consumer Confidence Report from CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS.