Water Quality Report · Updated May 12, 2026
TITUSVILLE, CITY OF
TITUSVILLE, CITY OF delivers tap water graded D (61/100) by TapWaterSafety.org. The utility serves approximately 57,218 residents in TITUSVILLE, Florida using surface water (purchased). The most significant water quality concerns are: PFAS contamination; Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline; Arsenic significantly above health guideline; Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline. For questions, the utility can be reached at 321-567-3702.
Is TITUSVILLE tap water safe to drink?
TITUSVILLE, CITY OF delivers tap water that earns a grade of D (61/100) from TapWaterSafety.org — a below-average rating, with multiple concerns including pfas contamination.
The utility serves 57,218 residents in TITUSVILLE, drawing from surface water (purchased).
Public testing data identifies 14 contaminants in this water above EWG's health-based guidelines, including: Haloacetic acids (HAA9), Arsenic, Haloacetic acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs), Dibromoacetic acid, Dichloroacetic acid, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Trichloroacetic acid, Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), Radium, combined (-226 and -228)*, Chromium (hexavalent), Chlorate. For most residents, a properly certified home filter at the kitchen tap is the most cost-effective way to reduce exposure to whatever's in your water. See our filter recommendations below, matched specifically to this utility's contaminant profile.
Quick actions for TITUSVILLE residents
Top concerns in this water
Based on the most recent EPA and EWG data, these are the most significant water quality issues for TITUSVILLE, CITY OF.
PFAS contamination
Severe concernPerfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) detected. PFAS are persistent chemicals linked to cancer and immune effects with no known safe exposure threshold.
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA9) detected at 33.9 ppb, 564x above the EWG health guideline of 0.06 ppb.
Arsenic significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernArsenic detected at 0.9 ppb, 225x above the EWG health guideline of 0.004 ppb.
Haloacetic acids (HAA5) significantly above health guideline
Moderate concernHaloacetic acids (HAA5) detected at 14.0 ppb, 140x above the EWG health guideline of 0.1 ppb.
Contact TITUSVILLE, CITY OF
Reach the utility directly for service issues, water quality concerns, or to request your Consumer Confidence Report.
General Contact
Treatment Plant
Recommended water filters for TITUSVILLE
Filters matched to the specific contaminants in this water supply.
Reverse Osmosis or NSF P473 certified carbon
$80-$750Activated carbon and RO are the only technologies proven to remove PFAS at certified levels.
Carbon block (NSF/ANSI 42 + 53)
$40-$750Activated carbon is highly effective for disinfection byproducts like TTHM and HAA5.
Reverse Osmosis
$249-$750Arsenic is most effectively removed by reverse osmosis. Some specialized adsorptive filters also work.
Disclosure: TapWaterSafety earns a commission from purchases made through these links. This does not influence our scoring methodology or filter selection.
Score breakdown
This utility's overall score of 61/100 breaks down across five weighted components. Read the full methodology →
Contaminants detected — international standards comparison
Every contaminant detected, compared side-by-side against US EPA legal limits, the EU Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), WHO Guidelines, and California's Public Health Goal (the strictest US benchmark). Why we show multiple standards →
| Contaminant | Detected | EWG US health-based |
EPA US legal |
EU DWD Europe |
WHO global |
CA PHG strictest US |
Tested sample year |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9) Disinfection byproduct |
33.9 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 564× over |
| Arsenic Heavy metal |
0.9 ppb | 0.004 | 10.0 | 10 | 10 | 0.004 | — | 225× over |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) Disinfection byproduct |
14.0 ppb | 0.1 | 60.0 | 60 | — | — | — | 140× over |
| Bromodichloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
5.28 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 88× over |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) Disinfection byproduct |
12.4 ppb | 0.15 | 80.0 | 100 | — | — | — | 83× over |
| Dibromoacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
1.54 ppb | 0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | 51× over |
| Dichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
8.19 ppb | 0.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 41× over |
| Chloroform Disinfection byproduct |
15.8 ppb | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 39× over |
| Dibromochloromethane Disinfection byproduct |
1.74 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 17× over |
| Trichloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
1.73 ppb | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 17× over |
| Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) PFAS |
3.5 ppt | 0.3 | 4.0 | 100 | 100 | 1 | — | 12× over |
| Radium, combined (-226 and -228)* Radiological |
0.49 pCi/L | 0.05 | 5.0 | — | — | — | — | 9.8× over |
| Chromium (hexavalent) Heavy metal |
0.0933 ppb | 0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | 4.7× over |
| Chlorate Disinfection byproduct |
236.0 ppb | 210.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.1× over |
| Bromate* Disinfection byproduct |
0.0629 ppb | 0.1 | 10.0 | 10 | 10 | 0.1 | — | Below guideline |
| Nitrate Inorganic |
0.075 ppm | 0.14 | 10.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 10 | — | Below guideline |
| Bromochloromethane Other |
0.0163 ppb | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Bromoform Disinfection byproduct |
0.026 ppb | 0.5 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Aluminum Heavy metal |
28.0 ppb | 600.0 | — | 200 | — | 600 | — | Below guideline |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate* Semi-volatile organic compound |
0.132 ppb | 3.0 | 6.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Monochloroacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
1.54 ppb | 53.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Vanadium Other |
0.584 ppb | 21.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Monobromoacetic acid Disinfection byproduct |
0.365 ppb | 25.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Barium Heavy metal |
4.0 ppb | 700.0 | 2000.0 | — | 1300 | 2000 | — | Below guideline |
| Manganese Heavy metal |
0.29 ppb | 100.0 | — | 50 | 80 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Molybdenum Other |
0.0833 ppb | 40.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Strontium Radiological |
0.566 ppb | 1500.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Fluoride Inorganic |
0.57 ppm | — | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | — | Below guideline |
| Lithium Other |
5.0 ppb | — | — | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
| Nitrite Inorganic |
0.023 ppm | — | 1.0 | — | — | — | — | Below guideline |
All values in the unit of the detected level. Red cells indicate the detected level exceeds that standard. Some contaminants have limits in some jurisdictions but not others (shown as —). The "Tested" column shows the year each contaminant sample was collected.
Sources: US EPA, EU Drinking Water Directive 2020/2184, WHO Guidelines (4th ed.), California OEHHA PHGs, EWG Tap Water Database.
TITUSVILLE, CITY OF service area
This water system serves 1 community in Brevard County, Florida. Click any city for its dedicated tap water quality page.
Find the right filter for TITUSVILLE water
Browse filter categories by water-quality concern. Each option below is NSF-certified for the matched contaminant type.